DIGEST
- Protest challenging agency’s evaluation of quotations under corporate experience factor is denied where the record shows that the evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the terms of the solicitation.
- Protest challenging agency’s source selection decision is denied where the record reflects that the source selection authority reasonably found the quotations of the awardee and the protester to be equal under the non-price factors and selected the lower-priced quotation for award.
DISCUSSION
Sparksoft first contends that the agency failed to qualitatively evaluate quotations under the corporate experience factor as required by the RFQ and unreasonably failed to consider Sparksoft’s corporate experience to be superior to Softrams’s. Protest at 7-9; Comments at 2-10. The agency responds that its evaluation of corporate experience was reasonable and consistent with the solicitation’s evaluation criteria. Memorandum of Law (MOL) at 5-7. As discussed below, we find the protester’s arguments provide no basis to sustain the protest.6
Where, as here, an agency issues a solicitation to GSA schedule contractors under FAR subpart 8.4 and conducts a competition, we will review the record to ensure that the evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the terms of the solicitation. Advantaged Solutions, Inc., B-418790, B-418790.2, Aug. 31, 2020, 2020 CPD ¶ 307 at 8. An agency’s evaluation of experience or past performance is, by its nature, subjective, and that evaluation, including the agency’s assessments with regard to relevance, scope, and significance, are matters of discretion which we will not disturb absent a clear demonstration that the assessments are unreasonable or inconsistent with the solicitation criteria. Logistics Mgmt. Inst., B-418160, B-418160.2, Jan. 16, 2020, 2020 CPD ¶ 31 at 8.
The protester first alleges that the agency unreasonably evaluated vendors’ corporate experience on a pass/fail basis instead of assessing the degree of relevant experience as required by the RFQ. Comments at 2-6. In this regard, the protester contends that the agency only considered whether a vendor had experience in each of the six service areas identified by the RFQ and did not examine or explain how the vendors met or surpassed the RFQ’s evaluation criteria. Comments at 3-4. For procurements conducted pursuant to FAR subpart 8.4 and requiring a statement of work, such as this one, FAR section 8.405-2(f) establishes minimum documentation requirements. RIVA Sols., Inc., B-418952, B-418952.2, Oct. 27, 2020, 2020 CPD ¶ 353 at 10. Here, while we agree with the protester that the contemporaneous record could have provided more detailed discussion of the agency’s consideration of corporate experience, we nonetheless find that the agency documented its evaluation judgments in sufficient detail to show that they were reasonable. See Logistics Mgmt. Inst., supra at 4; FAR 8.405-2.
DECISION
Sparksoft Corporation, a small business of Catonsville, Maryland, protests the issuance of a task order to Softrams, LLC, a small business of Leesburg, Virginia, under request for quotations (RFQ) No. 230352, issued by the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), for information technology (IT) services in support of CMS’s Business Operations Support Center (BOSC). The protester challenges the agency’s evaluation of Softrams’s corporate experience and the agency’s best-value tradeoff. We deny the protest.
Protestor: Sparksoft Corporation
Solicitation Number: RFQ-230352
Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
File number: B-421458.8
Outcome: Denied
Decision Date: Mar 15, 2024
Not Yet a Premium Partner/Sponsor? Learn more about the OS AI Premium Corporate and Individual Plans here. Plans start at $250 annually.