File B-422661.2

Digest

Request for recommendation that protest costs be reimbursed is denied where the challenge to the award of a sole-source contract is not clearly meritorious.

Discussion

Trilogy contends that reimbursement is warranted because its protest included clearly meritorious grounds, and because the agency’s corrective action, which was taken after the agency filed its report, was unduly delayed. Req. for Costs at 3. The agency objects to the request, arguing that the protest grounds were not clearly meritorious …

Decision

Trilogy Secured Services, LLC, of Springfield, Virginia, requests that we recommend the reimbursement of costs it incurred in filing and pursuing its protest challenging the award of a sole-source contract to Birdi Systems, Inc., of Pasadena, California, under solicitation No. 75F40124C00054, issued by the Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), for security installation and maintenance services. Trilogy argues that its protest was clearly meritorious, and that the agency unduly delayed taking corrective action.

We deny the request.

Read the decision here.

Ad



Not Yet a Premium Partner/Sponsor? Learn more about the OS AI Premium Corporate and Individual Plans here. Plans start at $250 annually.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

Leave a Reply