{"id":87927,"date":"2024-04-17T14:29:29","date_gmt":"2024-04-17T18:29:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/orangeslices.ai\/?p=87927"},"modified":"2024-04-18T06:32:49","modified_gmt":"2024-04-18T10:32:49","slug":"decision-released-protest-denial-of-1b-cms-agile-collaboration-and-modernization-endeavors-acme-bpa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/orangeslices.ai\/decision-released-protest-denial-of-1b-cms-agile-collaboration-and-modernization-endeavors-acme-bpa\/","title":{"rendered":"Decision Released: Protest Denial of $1B CMS Agile Collaboration and Modernization Endeavors (ACME) BPA"},"content":{"rendered":"

Updated April 17, 2024<\/strong><\/p>\n

Case ID: B-421561.13,B-421561.16,B-421561.18<\/p>\n

Digest<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. In procurement conducted pursuant to the provisions of Federal Acquisition Regulation subpart 8.4, agency reasonably determined the protester\u2019s quotation ineligible for award where the solicitation required vendors to quote labor categories under a particular General Services Administration Multiple Award Schedule Special Item Number (SIN), and the protester quoted labor categories not under the required SIN.<\/li>\n
  2. Protester is not an interested party to challenge the agency\u2019s evaluation and best\u2011value tradeoff where protester is not eligible for award.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Discussion<\/p>\n

    BAO raises numerous challenges to CMS\u2019s evaluation of its quotation and the resulting award decision. The gravamen of BAO\u2019s protest is that CMS should not have rejected its quotation because BAO quoted labor categories within the scope of its MAS contract, which it argues included labor categories from SIN 54151S. Protest at 19-21. BAO also alleges that the agency unreasonably evaluated its quotation under factor 3, technical challenge, conducted unequal and undocumented exchanges, and made an unreasonable best-value tradeoff decision. Protest at 21-28; Comments & Supp. Protest at 19-20; Supp Comments & 2nd Supp. Protest at 19-20. For the reasons that follow, we find the agency reasonably determined BAO was ineligible for award for quoting labor rates and categories inapplicable to the RFQ, and we deny this protest ground. We dismiss the remaining allegations because BAO is not an interested party.<\/p>\n

    BAO argues that the agency improperly rejected its quotation for quoting SIN 581210C labor rates and categories. Protest at 19\u201121. The protester contends the agency\u2019s action were improper because BAO\u2019s MAS contract has been approved for both SIN 581210C and SIN 54151S. Id. In this regard, BAO asserts that it submitted labor categories in its quotation approved under its \u2026<\/p>\n

    Decision<\/p>\n

    BAO Systems, LLC (BAO), a small business of Washington, D.C., protests the decision by the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), not to select its quotation for the establishment of a blanket purchase agreement (BPA) under request for quotations (RFQ) No. 75FCMC21Q0013 for agile collaboration and modernization endeavors (ACME). The RFQ sought to establish BPAs with multiple vendors holding contracts under General Services Administration (GSA) multiple award schedule (MAS) special item number (SIN) 54151S, information technology (IT) professional services. BAO argues that the agency unreasonably determined it was ineligible for award. BAO also challenges the agency\u2019s evaluation of quotations and best-value determination.<\/p>\n

    We deny in part, and dismiss in part, the protest.<\/p>\n

    Read the decision here.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    BAO argues that the agency unreasonably determined it was ineligible for award. BAO also challenges the agency\u2019s evaluation of quotations and best-value determination. We deny in part, and dismiss in part, the protest.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":36472,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"content-type":"","_relevanssi_hide_post":"","_relevanssi_hide_content":"","_relevanssi_pin_for_all":"","_relevanssi_pin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_unpin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_include_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_exclude_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_no_append":"","_relevanssi_related_not_related":"","_relevanssi_related_posts":"","_relevanssi_noindex_reason":"","footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[1321,657541],"tags":[5607,110765,703931],"acf":{"uuid":""},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/news-cdn.orangeslices.ai\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/22002748\/Untitled-design-80.png","publishpress_future_action":{"enabled":false,"date":"2024-05-26 01:06:37","action":"change-status","newStatus":"draft","terms":[],"taxonomy":"category"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/orangeslices.ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87927"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/orangeslices.ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/orangeslices.ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orangeslices.ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orangeslices.ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=87927"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/orangeslices.ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87927\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":87928,"href":"https:\/\/orangeslices.ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87927\/revisions\/87928"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orangeslices.ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/36472"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/orangeslices.ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=87927"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orangeslices.ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=87927"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orangeslices.ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=87927"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}