File B-422862.2<\/p>\n
Digest<\/p>\n
Protest challenging the agency\u2019s evaluation of quotations is denied where the agency\u2019s evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the terms of the solicitation and applicable procurement law.<\/p>\n
Discussion<\/p>\n
Tuknik challenges the agency\u2019s evaluation in several respects. First, the protester argues that the agency improperly evaluated Improvix\u2019s quotation as high confidence with respect to Improvix\u2019s transition plan and past performance. Protest at 17-18; Comments at 6-8. Second, the protester contends that the agency erred in evaluating Tuknik\u2019s present and past experience, recruitment and retention capability, and key personnel and staffing.[2] Comments at 2-6. We address these arguments in turn below \u2026<\/p>\n
Decision<\/p>\n
Tuknik Government Services, LLC, a small business of Anchorage, Alaska, challenges the issuance of a task order to Improvix Technologies, Inc., a small business of Reston, Virginia, pursuant to request for quotations (RFQ) No. 19AQMM24Q0049, issued under the General Services Administration’s Streamlined Technology Acquisition Resource for Services III governmentwide acquisition contract by the Department of State for cloud program management information technology (IT) services. The protester alleges that the agency erred in evaluating quotations and in the conduct of its best-value tradeoff.<\/p>\n
We deny the protest.<\/p>\n
Read the decision here.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"