Notice ID BEPIT-RFI-24-0006

This is a courtesy notice that a Sources Sought/RFI is posted to GSA eBuy. The number is BEPIT-RFI-24-0006 (GSA ID RFQ1661811). Information pertaining to the Sources Sought is available under MAS 518210ERM, Electronic Records Management Solutions and will be distributed solely through eBuy. No documents will be provided outside of GSA eBuy.

The scope of this project includes all document management and support services required to scan, tag, support Search Engine Optimization (SEO), store, access, control and manage digital records along with all necessary technical services to design, test, implement, secure, operate, and maintain a comprehensive ERM system with effective internal controls to secure and safeguard electronic records.

The scope includes:

Records Management: Full lifecycle management support of electronic records in accordance with Federal and bureau records management standards and rules

Paper-to-Electronic Record Conversion: Scanning, analyzing, indexing, quality checking, and storing existing paper records as electronic records.

Indexing and Searching Engine: Enables indexing and searching of stored e-records by managing metadata about the records. This is the central engine that controls access and life cycle for all the managed artifacts governed by established policies and procedures.

Security & Business Rules: Access controls applied universally to protect data and enforce business policies. Business rules leveraged by all components to ensure consistency, completeness, and accuracy of metadata.

Extensible: In the future, other systems (using application programming interface (API)) should be able to read, write, manage, and access records to the provided solution.

More here.

 



Want to get involved with OS AI? - A small number of Sponsorship Opportunities are now available here. Starting at $500.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

Leave a Reply